articlefert.blogg.se

American radium orange nj
American radium orange nj









american radium orange nj

She delayed visiting her dentist for some time because other persons who had radium poisoning had demonstrated symptoms similar to those from which she suffered. In the latter part of 1927 the decedent complained of a fear that she might have radium poisoning. Her health remained excellent up until the autumn of 1927. In April, 1921, the decedent was married to the plaintiff. The evidence shows that the decedent was in good health at the time she left the employ of the defendant. | Radium Ingested | Radium Ingested | Radium Constantly The plaintiff has incorporated the following chart in his brief and *265 accepts the figures used in the third column for his purposes: At any rate, the maximum quantity the decedent might have ingested was 43 micrograms of radium sulphate for each working day. It appears that the radium used by decedent had between 8 and 30 micrograms of radium element to one gram of zinc sulphide and 1,000 micrograms equal one milligram and 1,000 milligrams equal one gram. Some re-pointed the brush after each numeral. Some girls painted an entire dial with a single pointing of the brush. The brush would then be repointed in the mouth and dipped into the paint or even repointed in such manner after being dipped into the paint itself, in a continuous process. This water remained in the crucible without change for a day or perhaps two days. The brush was then dipped into the paint, the figures painted upon the dial until more paint was required or until the paint on the brush dried and hardened, when the brush was dipped into a small crucible of water. In order to obtain the fine lines which the work required, a girl would place the bristles in her mouth, and by the action of her tongue and lips bring the bristles to a fine point. In the painting each girl used a very fine brush of camel's hair containing about thirty hairs. There were fourteen numerals, the figure six being omitted. When the paint-like substance was produced a girl would employ it in painting the figures on a watch dial. In the course of a working week each girl painted the dials contained on twenty-two to forty-four such trays, depending upon the speed with which she worked, and used a vial of powder for each tray. A quantity of gum arabic, as an adhesive, and a thinner of water were then added, and this was stirred with a small glass rod until a paintlike substance resulted. The powder was poured from the vial into a small porcelain crucible, about the size of a thimble. This compound was contained in a small vial about an inch and one-half long and about the size of an ordinary lead pencil in diameter. The material was a powder, of about the consistency of cosmetic powder, and consisted of phosphorescent zinc sulphide mixed with radium sulphate. Each girl procured a tray containing twenty-four watch dials and the material to be used to paint the numerals upon them so that they would appear luminous. Each girl worked a few feet away from the girl next to her and a few feet away from the girl at the opposite side of the table. They worked at four rows of tables extending practically the length of the room.

#American radium orange nj windows

The windows were regulated by any of the girls who saw fit to do so. The decedent was one of eighty girls who worked for five and one-half days per week in a large factory room ventilated by a skylight and by windows around the room. While the decedent was in the employ of the defendant, no precautions were taken to prevent dial painters from being exposed to the small quantity of radium sulphate, an insoluble salt, and the radium emanation present in the air of their workrooms. The decedent was employed to paint the dials of inexpensive watches with a luminous paint containing small quantities of the element radium in the form of a sulphate. La Porte, the plaintiff's intestate, was employed by the defendant, the United States Radium Corporation, from May 14, 1917, to December 11, 1918, and for a brief period of not over six weeks in 1920. The principal question in this suit is whether or not the plaintiff, in an action at law for damages caused by injuries to the plaintiff's intestate and her subsequent death, is entitled to an injunction restraining the defendant from pleading the statute of limitations as a bar to the plaintiff's alleged cause of action at law on the ground of equitable fraud. J., of counsel), for plaintiff.Ĭollins & Corbin (by Edward Markley) and Edwards, Smith & Dawson (by Edwin F.











American radium orange nj